Home
IT Hub
AI

How to Secure Make.com Integrations in Enterprise Settings

Reco Security Experts
Updated
November 25, 2025
November 25, 2025

Securing Make.com integrations in an enterprise environment now requires addressing identity, data flows, API exposure, credential handling, governance, and operational monitoring. Make.com is a visual-first automation and integration platform that connects SaaS applications, APIs, databases, and AI-driven components through modular, no-code scenarios.

With the 2025 Wave releases, such as next-generation AI Agents, authenticated webhooks, Make Code, and expanded Make Grid capabilities, the integration surface has grown, but the security fundamentals remain consistent.

Enterprises must understand how workflows execute, how data moves between systems, and how new AI-driven automation components interact with internal and external services. This article explains how to secure Make.com comprehensively in modern enterprise settings.

1. Understanding the Integration Surface

To design a secure setup, you must first understand what Make.com introduces into your environment.

Make.com scenario dashboard showing workflow components

Source

Make.com acts as an orchestration layer that connects to internal and external systems through modules and scenarios. These scenarios may handle customer data, internal documents, authentication tokens, and operational triggers from SaaS platforms, APIs, or databases. Because Make.com sits between systems, its security posture directly impacts your broader architecture.

Large enterprises typically integrate HR systems, CRMs, data warehouses, ticketing platforms, monitoring tools, and cloud services. This creates multiple attack surfaces: connection credentials, webhook triggers, API responses, data transformations, and runtime execution. The first step is mapping every system that Make.com interacts with, along with the sensitivity of the exchanged data.

2. Platform-Level Security Capabilities

Before adding your own controls, review what Make.com already provides.

Make.com no-code visual automation interface

Source

Make.com’s Enterprise plans support:

  • SSO with providers such as Azure AD, Okta, and Google Workspace
  • Data encryption in transit and at rest
  • SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance
  • Team roles and permissions
  • Audit logging for user actions, workflow execution, and changes

These features form a secure base, but enterprises still need custom controls for identity, data handling, network restrictions, and operational governance.

3. Enterprise Identity and Access Management

This section builds on the platform’s controls and integrates them with enterprise IAM standards.

SSO login flow diagram

Source

Start by enabling SSO for all Make.com users, enforced through your central identity provider. Multi-factor authentication should be mandatory for your IdP. Once SSO is configured, map business roles to Make.com’s role structure. For example, automation developers may edit scenarios but cannot modify production connections. Auditors may only view logs. Administrators in your enterprise IAM team can provision users automatically through SCIM or manual mapping.

Segregation of environments is also critical. Development, testing, and production should be separate workspaces with isolated credentials and connections. A developer should not have the ability to trigger workflows in production by mistake or to access production tokens. This separation reduces misconfiguration risk and helps build a pipeline-like automation lifecycle.

4. Protecting Data Movement and Storage

Make.com often moves data between systems. Each data exchange must be secured end to end.

Make.com module data pipeline

Source

All connections in Make.com communicate over HTTPS, but you should validate certificate handling and disable insecure endpoints. If your internal systems expose APIs, enforce TLS 1.2+ and strong authentication. When moving sensitive fields (like identity data, health records, financial attributes), filter or mask fields before sending them to external services.

Make.com stores scenario logs and temporary data snapshots. Enterprises with compliance requirements should configure retention periods and restrict log access. Teams handling regulated data (HIPAA, GDPR, PCI) must ensure that the Make.com region aligns with data residency policies.

Whenever possible, prevent full payload retrieval. If a module allows requesting specific fields, always reduce the data footprint. Limiting unnecessary data movement lowers the risk of unintended exposure.

Insight by
Gal Nakash
Cofounder & CPO at Reco

Gal is the Cofounder & CPO of Reco. Gal is a former Lieutenant Colonel in the Israeli Prime Minister's Office. He is a tech enthusiast, with a background of Security Researcher and Hacker. Gal has led teams in multiple cybersecurity areas with an expertise in the human element.

Expert Insight: Don't Let Make.com Become Your Softest Link

  • Tactical Insight: Treat Make.com as a privileged orchestrator—not just a connector. Every scenario must be governed like code. Apply least privilege, scoped credentials, and enforce scenario reviews as part of CI-like lifecycle gates. Build credential stores externally and authenticate via expiring tokens to limit blast radius.
  • Detection or Operational Context:Monitor Make.com execution logs via SIEM ingestion and alert on anomalies like unexpected API call spikes, payload size changes, or repeated failures. Use identity-aware segmentation: separate Dev/Test/Prod workspaces with scoped access mapped via Okta or Azure AD groups.
  • Business Impact or Tradeoff: Make.com accelerates automation, but without governance, it creates invisible sprawl. The tradeoff is velocity vs. control—without lifecycle oversight, one misconfigured scenario can leak data or hammer internal APIs, especially with Waves ‘25 agents and subscenarios.

5. Credential and Connection Security

Credentials are the most sensitive component in Make.com integrations. Every connection in Make.com stores tokens, API keys, or OAuth authorizations. To minimise risk:

  • Use OAuth2 instead of static API keys when connectors support it.
  • Create dedicated service accounts, not personal accounts, for connections.
  • Restrict each account to the minimal access necessary for its scenario.
  • Rotate tokens or keys periodically.
  • Immediately revoke unused or stale connections.

If your organization uses a secret manager (AWS, Vault, Azure Key Vault), integrate secret rotation from the external system and periodically re-authenticate Make.com connections. Whenever possible, avoid embedding secrets in script modules or HTTP module URLs.

When exposing internal APIs to Make.com, front them with an API gateway that enforces rate limits, throttling, authentication checks, and logging. If a workflow loops unexpectedly, the gateway prevents it from overwhelming downstream systems.

6. Governance, Monitoring and Auditability

Each workflow must follow an operational structure similar to any enterprise application.

Make.com analytics and reporting dashboard

 Source

Enterprises should maintain a governance model documenting:

  • Ownership of scenarios
  • Approval workflows for creating new connections
  • Change management rules
  • Versioning practices
  • Periodic scenario reviews

Make.com’s monitoring tools provide logs, execution results, error details, and scenario histories. Forward these logs to your SIEM for unified alerting. Configure alerts for repeated failures, sudden increases in API calls, or large data transfers. These patterns often indicate misconfiguration or malicious activity.

Audit logs from Make.com should be integrated into your compliance process. Track who modified scenarios, who changed credentials, and what workflows moved regulated data. Regular audits help identify unnecessary scenarios or permissions that have accumulated over time.

Features Description
Make Grid Enhancements (2025) Use Make Grid’s real-time map, asset health flags, SQL parsing, and credit/data consumption visibility to detect problematic assets and prioritize remediation.
Scenario Sharing Define access rules and a pre-share review workflow: decide who may share scenarios internally, who may publish externally, and require a security sign-off before any public sharing.
Agent & Subscenario governance Treat reusable agents and subscenarios as organizational assets that require the same review and lifecycle controls as production code.

7. Designing Secure Make.com Scenarios

Security must be part of workflow design, not only infrastructure.

Make.com scenario builder screenshot

Source

Scenarios should be clear, modular, and easy to review. Instead of building a single large workflow, break it into smaller scenarios that expose only the required inputs. This reduces the risk of data leaking between unrelated steps and makes it easier to maintain individual components.

Add error-handling branches to catch failures and respond safely. For example, if an API returns a 500, the scenario should stop processing and raise an alert rather than continue with incomplete data.

When scenarios handle sensitive information, apply strict controls to limit exposure.

  • Avoid storing sensitive fields in data store modules unless retention is required.
  • Prevent sensitive values from appearing in logs.
  • Validate outputs before sending data to downstream systems.

Approval steps are essential for high-risk workflows. When automation writes to a CRM, updates customer records, or triggers infrastructure actions, it should require a manual confirmation step from an authorized user. Version history must be preserved through exports or documentation. Any scenario change should follow the same review and approval process that your organization uses for code updates.

Waves ’25 Updates

With the Waves ’25 updates, scenario design now includes a few additional elements that require attention. Features such as next-generation AI Agents, Module Tools, Make Code (Python/JS), and reusable Subscenarios introduce new execution surfaces that must be governed carefully. These components offer greater flexibility but also expand where data flows and how actions are triggered. When designing scenarios, review how agents make decisions, limit which tools they can call, validate code modules before production use, and apply clear rules for sharing and reusing subscenarios to ensure predictable and secure automation across teams.

8. Continuous Security Review and Lifecycle Management

Security for Make.com integrations should evolve with your automation landscape.

Dashboard showing automation execution statistics

Source

Enterprises should conduct periodic reviews of all active scenarios. Remove unused connections, invalid tokens, and outdated workflows. Map which workflows handle sensitive data and confirm their compliance posture annually. Threat modelling helps uncover risks in new scenarios. Evaluate where data enters, where it leaves, who accesses it, and what authentication is involved. Document risks and assign owners.

Your automation team should receive training on secure integration practices, data minimization, credential hygiene, and proper use of Make.com features. A strong security culture is essential as automation grows across departments. Finally, maintain an incident response plan specific to Make.com. If a scenario malfunctions, you should know how to disable it quickly, revoke credentials, analyze logs, and restore operations. Regular tabletop exercises ensure your team can react effectively.

Conclusion

Make.com can be safely deployed in enterprise environments when supported by a strong identity model, secure connection management, careful data handling, network-level protection, and continuous governance. By integrating Make.com's native security features with enterprise controls, especially IAM, audit logging, API gateways, and workflow design principles, you create a reliable and scalable automation foundation.

FAQ's

What’s the simplest way to set up identity controls for new Make.com users in an enterprise?

Enforce SSO-only access with MFA inherited from your identity provider.

  • Connect Make.com to Azure AD/Okta/Google Workspace for centralized login.
  • Assign baseline roles (viewer, builder, admin) tied to identity groups.
  • Disable local login and require SCIM provisioning where supported.
  • Validate that least-privilege roles map correctly to workspace scopes.

Related reading: IAM for SaaS

How do enterprise security teams harden Make.com’s new AI Agents, Make Code, and Subscenarios?

Limit their tool access, validate code execution paths, and treat each component as a governed runtime.

  • Require security review of Make Code modules (Python/JS) before promotion.
  • Restrict Agent tool permissions (CRUD, API scopes, data access).
  • Define owner groups responsible for Subscenario lifecycle maintenance.
  • Use audit logs to detect unexpected agent-driven automation chains.

Related reading: AI Governance & Security Platform

How does Reco secure Make.com workflows using identity context and SSPM++ workflows?

Reco ingests Make.com identities, tokens, and workflow actions to map exposure paths and enforce controls.

  • Input: Make.com connectors, service accounts, webhook activity, scenario permissions.
  • Actions: Reco’s AI Agents flag over-privileged connections, detect risky data flows, and validate external API access policies.
  • Output: Automated remediation (token rotation, policy enforcement, permission right-sizing) through guided or auto-executed workflows.

Learn more: Identity & Access Governance

EXPERIENCE RECO 1:1 - BOOK A DEMO

Discover How Reco Can Help You Protect Your AI Environment

“I’ve looked at other tools in this space and Reco is the best choice based on use cases I had and their dedication to success of our program. I always recommend Reco to my friends and associates, and would recommend it to anyone looking to get their arms around shadow IT and implement effective SaaS security.”
Mike D'Arezzo
Executive Director of Security
“We decided to invest in SaaS Security over other more traditional types of security because of the growth of SaaS that empowers our business to be able to operate the way that it does. It’s just something that can’t be ignored anymore or put off.”
Aaron Ansari
CISO
“With Reco, our posture score has gone from 55% to 67% in 30 days and more improvements to come in 7-10 days. We are having a separate internal session with our ServiceNow admin to address these posture checks.”
Jen Langford
Information Security & Compliance Analyst
“That's a huge differentiator compared to the rest of the players in the space. And because most of the time when you ask for integrations for a solution, they'll say we'll add it to our roadmap, maybe next year. Whereas Reco is very adaptable. They add new integrations quickly, including integrations we've requested.”
Kyle Kurdziolek
Head of Security

Explore More

Ready for SaaS Security that can keep up?

Request a demo