AI Governance in SaaS: Overview, Best Practices, and How Reco Can Help

The AI revolution isn’t confined to fancy new startups or dedicated AI platforms – it’s quietly creeping into the everyday tools we’ve used for years. Zoom now offers AI meeting summaries; Slack is rolling out generative AI assistants; even stalwart enterprise apps like Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and ServiceNow have baked in Agentic AI copilots. Over the last year, virtually every major vendor has rushed to embed AI into their offerings.

‍

The result? Most organizations are now finding out during vendor reviews or contract renewals that AI capabilities have proliferated throughout their SaaS stack – essentially AI Sprawl, where AI tools spread across the company without centralized oversight. Security leaders are caught off guard by this shadow AI infiltration, scrambling to understand where sensitive data might be going and how to regain control.

‍

Understanding AI Sprawl in the SaaS Ecosystem

‍

AI sprawl describes the rapid, often uncontrolled proliferation of AI tools, models, and applications across an organization's technology landscape. In SaaS environments, this sprawl manifests in several ways:

1. Shadow AI Adoption: Employees sign up for AI tools without security team knowledge or approval, creating blind spots in your security posture.
   
   
2. SaaS AI Feature Explosion: Existing SaaS vendors rapidly integrating AI capabilities into their platforms, often with default settings that prioritize functionality over security.
   
   
3. AI Data Connections: New integrations between AI tools and corporate data sources, creating complex data pathways that security teams struggle to track.

→ Read Next: SaaS-to-AI Data Exposure Risks – ChatGPT Integrations

‍

The Key Risks of Unmanaged AI

‍

Without proper governance, the sudden influx of AI features and apps can expose organizations to serious security and compliance risks. Some of the top concerns include:

‍

• Unauthorized AI Data Access - AI agents often need broad access to data – for example, an AI meeting assistant might ingest call recordings, or a sales AI might pull entire customer records. If unsanctioned or unchecked, these AI tools can tap into sensitive information without proper oversight. In fact, about 33% of SaaS integrations are granted sensitive data access or privileged permissions to the core SaaS application. This means a single AI plugin could inadvertently unlock troves of confidential data (think of an AI bot in Slack reading private messages or an AI add-on in Salesforce pulling customer PII), greatly increasing the risk of data leaks and unauthorized access.

‍

• SaaS-to-SaaS Exposure - SaaS apps rarely operate in isolation – they connect with each other via integrations and APIs. An AI tool integrated into one platform can often reach into another. This SaaS-to-SaaS interconnection amplifies the blast radius if something goes wrong. A poorly governed AI integration might shuttle data from a low-trust app into a high-value system or vice versa, creating new attack pathways. Each new AI integration expands the potential attack surface, as multiple applications begin exchanging sensitive data beyond the security team’s visibility.

‍

• Compliance Blind Spots - When employees use AI tools without oversight, organizations can unknowingly violate data protection laws and industry regulations. If an employee pastes customer data into an AI chatbot or allows an unapproved AI to process personal information, the company may be breaching privacy regulations like GDPR or HIPAA without realizing it. Shadow AI creates blind spots in compliance reporting – you simply may not know that regulated data is being fed into external AI systems. This lack of awareness can lead to audit failures or legal penalties. A lot of AI tools are also cloud-based services that store data in ways that might conflict with regional data sovereignty laws or contractual obligations, adding further compliance risk.

‍

Why AI Governance Is Challenging

‍

If governing traditional SaaS was challenging, overseeing AI in those same systems is even tougher. 

• Lack of visibility: Organizations often don’t really know which AI tools or built-in features employees are using. Shadow AI thrives when people sign up for free AI services or enable new AI-powered functions in existing apps without informing IT or security teams. As a result, security leaders frequently find themselves flying blind, unable to see all the AI instances touching sensitive data. Without that full-scope view, unchecked AI can introduce serious security and compliance risks - after all, you can’t govern what you can’t see.

• Fragmented ownership: At the same time, AI sprawl tends to emerge in an ad-hoc, siloed fashion. Different departments might independently use AI solutions to tackle similar challenges without the knowledge of other teams or any central strategy. For example, marketing might subscribe to an AI copywriting service while engineering tests out an AI coding assistant, each operating under its own assumptions and security practices. This fragmentation leads to redundant tools, inconsistent security controls, and no single point of accountability. It’s shadow IT taken to a whole new level: every pocket of AI usage becomes its own potential security gap.

• Shadow AI: The pace at which AI integrations change makes governance feel like a constant game of whack-a-mole. New GenAI and Agentic AI features and third-party apps spring up on a weekly basis, and many employees are eager to try them as soon as they become available. In fact, over half of U.S. workers have already used GenAI tools at work without IT’s approval, drawn in by free trials or easy plug-and-play integrations.

• AI feature proliferation: What might seem like a safe app today could introduce a new AI module tomorrow that fundamentally changes its risk profile. Security teams struggle to keep policies, vendor risk assessments, and controls up to date when everything is moving so quickly. Attack vectors like prompt injection attacks and unexpected data leakage scenarios only add more urgency to the problem.

Best Practices for Building an AI Governance Framework

‍

To get ahead of AI sprawl and mitigate these risks, organizations need an organized AI governance framework. Here are some best practices that security leaders are applying:

‍

1. Inventory All AI Tools - Start with visibility. You can’t govern AI if you don’t know it’s there. Conduct a thorough audit to identify every AI application, feature, and integration in use, including any shadow AI tools employees may have adopted without approval. Most leaders are surprised by how many AI-driven tools are already in their environment. Build a centralized inventory or registry of these AI assets – what they do, which data they access, and which teams use them. This living inventory is the foundation of governance, as it gives you a bird’s-eye view of where AI is touching your business.

‍

2. Establish AI Usage Policies - Develop and communicate policies that define approved AI use and data handling guidelines. Much like acceptable use policies for IT, an AI policy should spell out which AI tools are allowed (or banned), what types of data can be fed into AI models, and requirements for vetting new AI vendors. For example, you might prohibit uploading sensitive customer data to any generative AI service unless it’s been security-reviewed. Also set guidelines around transparency – employees should inform IT/security when they want to use a new AI tool.

‍

3. Monitor Access and Use Controls - Once AI tools are approved and in use, continuously monitor who and what they are accessing. This is about applying the classic principle of least privilege and data protection principles to AI. Ensure each AI integration only accesses the minimum data necessary – if an AI sales assistant only needs CRM read access, don’t give it write or admin rights. Monitor usage to verify AI apps aren’t poking around where they shouldn’t. Technologies like SaaS security posture management can help centralize visibility into all these connections. If an AI tool starts behaving outside of policy, have the means to detect and block that. Regularly review third-party AI app permissions and cut off anything that’s no longer needed.

‍

4. Risk Assessments - AI governance is not a one-and-done project. Given the evolution, you’ll need an ongoing process to reassess risks and adapt controls. Establish a cadence (monthly or quarterly) to re-scan for any new AI services in use, review updates to vendors’ AI features, and evaluate their impact on security. Stay informed on AI threats and vulnerabilities – for example, new prompt injection attacks or data leakage incidents – and update your policies accordingly. Continuous monitoring and assessment of your AI-integrated SaaS environment is key. Some organizations form an AI governance committee (including security, IT, legal, and compliance) to regularly review the AI inventory and approve or reject new AI use cases.

‍

How Reco Enables AI Governance

‍

Building an AI governance program from scratch can feel daunting. This is where security platforms like Reco can make a huge difference – by automating visibility and control across your SaaS and AI landscape. Reco’s dynamic SaaS security solution is designed to give security teams powerful capabilities for governing generative AI usage:

‍

1. Shadow AI Detection

‍

Reco automatically discovers AI applications and copilots connected to your SaaS environment, even those installed without IT’s knowledge. It provides complete visibility into connected shadow AI tools, their utilization by employees, and what data they access. In practical terms, Reco shines a light on any unauthorized GenAI browser extensions, SaaS add-ons, or integrations lurking in your organization – so there are no more blind spots. Security teams get an up-to-date inventory of all AI instances in use (authorized or not), who is using them, and how they’re using them.

2. Data Protection & Governance

‍

Once Reco identifies an AI tool, it analyzes the permissions and data flows to map out exactly what that AI can access. This includes information that is fed to copilots. Reco helps you scrutinize each GenAI and Agentic AI app’s permissions and enforce policies on sensitive data access. For example, if an AI scheduling assistant is connected to your calendar SaaS, Reco will show the scope of data it has (read-only vs. full access) and whether it’s pulling any confidential info. You can define guardrails - e.g., flag if an AI app tries to access customer data or export large datasets – and Reco will alert or block those actions based on policy.

3. SaaS-to-SaaS Risk Discovery

‍

A unique challenge with generative AI is that it often bridges multiple apps (as we discussed). Reco addresses this by tracking and analyzing SaaS-to-SaaS connections involving AI. It can identify when an AI-enhanced integration has excessive privileges or links a low-trust app to a high-value one, so you can mitigate that risk. For instance, Reco might discover that an unapproved AI bot installed by a Slack workspace admin is also connected to your Salesforce instance – and that it was inadvertently given admin-level access in Salesforce.

4. Identity & Access Governance

‍

Reco applies identity and access governance to GenAI and Agentic AI usage across your SaaS environment. It brings together identity data from multiple SaaS platforms to identify users, including those interacting with AI tools, who may have excessive permissions, unused admin roles, or risky combinations of access. For example, Reco can detect a former employee who still has access to an AI assistant connected to sensitive systems, or an AI bot that was mistakenly given admin-level privileges.

Take Your Next Steps With Reco

‍

AI is here to stay – and security teams don’t want to be the department of “no,” blocking useful AI tools that could boost productivity. The answer lies in governance: with the right framework and tools, you can use AI confidently without compromising security. The key is visibility and control.

‍

When you know exactly which AI tools are operating in your enterprise and have policies to guide their use, you transform AI from a wild risk into a well-managed asset. By taking proactive steps to establish AI governance and monitoring, businesses can harness the power of AI while mitigating the risks of its uncontrolled growth.

‍

This is precisely part of Reco’s mission. By providing the visibility, automated controls, and continuous oversight needed for AI in SaaS, Reco equips security leaders to say “yes” to innovation – with full confidence that sensitive data and compliance remain intact.

‍

Contact us to learn how we can help you establish an effective AI governance program.