Strengthening Your Enterprise with AI Security Best Practices

AI is rapidly becoming the backbone of enterprise productivity, powering copilots, analytics, and automation across every department. As these systems assume greater decision-making power, they also introduce new layers of security vulnerability. AI security now extends beyond infrastructure protection, and it focuses on monitoring and managing how intelligent systems behave across the organization.

‍

What is AI Security

‍

AI security is the coordinated effort to protect artificial intelligence systems, datasets, and model outputs from manipulation, unauthorized access, or unintended disclosure. It also involves applying AI-driven capabilities to reinforce enterprise defenses across cloud and SaaS ecosystems. The goal is to ensure that machine learning models operate within verified boundaries, that data flows remain auditable, and that every stage of model development and use complies with established governance and privacy requirements.

‍

Key AI Security Risks

‍

AI adoption often outpaces the security frameworks designed to contain it. Each model, dataset, and integration can introduce new pathways for misuse or data exposure. Understanding these risks early helps teams build resilient controls that evolve in tandem with the technology.

• Data Poisoning and Integrity Threats: Attackers may inject or alter data within training sets or retrieval sources to influence model outcomes. Even minor corruption can skew predictions or responses across production environments. Maintaining dataset provenance, validation workflows, and retraining controls helps prevent undetected manipulation.
  
• Adversarial Attacks on AI Models: Malicious prompts or inputs can exploit model logic to bypass filters or produce harmful results. These attacks take advantage of weaknesses in contextual understanding. Adversarial testing, prompt sanitization, and continuous evaluation help detect and contain them.
  
• Privacy Risks and Sensitive Data Exposure: Prompts, embeddings, or outputs can reveal confidential or regulated information through memory logs or inadvertent retrieval. Encryption, access segmentation, and redaction at both input and output stages help reduce exposure.
  
• Supply Chain and Third-Party Model Risks: Pretrained models, open libraries, and hosted APIs may introduce unverified dependencies. Without provenance controls, organizations inherit risks from external codebases and weights. Vendor assessments, version pinning, and signature verification strengthen supply chain assurance.
  
• Shadow AI and Unmanaged Tools: Employees often deploy unapproved AI or tools that handle internal or sensitive data without oversight. These tools can move or process sensitive data outside policy scope. Continuous discovery, classification, and governance restore visibility across all AI activities and tools.

AI Security Process

‍

Building AI security into enterprise infrastructure requires a structured approach that connects governance, data control, and technical assurance. The following six steps form a continuous loop that allows security teams to assess, strengthen, and adapt their defenses as AI systems evolve.

‍

Step 1: Risk Assessment and Compliance Mapping

‍

The first step is to identify where AI systems operate, what data they access, and which regulations apply. Mapping models and datasets against privacy, compliance, and organizational policies establishes a clear baseline for protection. This process ensures that every model and integration aligns with legal and internal governance requirements before deployment.

‍

Step 2: Securing Data Pipelines

‍

AI systems rely on large, dynamic datasets, making the data pipeline a critical control point. Encryption in transit and at rest, controlled access, and continuous validation of data integrity help maintain trust throughout the flow. Secure APIs and monitored ingestion endpoints prevent unauthorized modification or exposure of training and inference data.

‍

Step 3: Model Integrity Checks

‍

Model integrity involves verifying that AI behavior remains consistent and unaltered after deployment. Hash-based verification, stored model signatures, and controlled deployment workflows help confirm that model files remain unaltered. Scheduled validation runs ensure outputs remain accurate and aligned with expected performance baselines.

‍

Step 4: Threat Monitoring and Detection

‍

Once AI systems are operational, continuous monitoring is essential. Behavioral analytics, anomaly detection, and AI-native threat indicators allow teams to recognize when prompts, inputs, or outputs deviate from approved boundaries. Integration with security event systems ensures alerts are contextual and actionable.

‍

Step 5: Incident Response Planning

‍

AI-related incidents require specialized playbooks addressing issues like model drift, data exposure, or compromised pipelines. A defined escalation path, combined with immediate model isolation and version rollback, helps contain damage quickly. Coordination across security, engineering, and compliance teams ensures that remediation actions are complete and documented.

‍

Step 6: Continuous Updates and Improvement

‍

AI environments change constantly as models evolve, regulations update, and new threats appear. Maintaining protection means auditing controls, retraining defense models, and refining monitoring logic on a recurring schedule. This cycle creates an adaptive defense posture that improves with each iteration and keeps pace with innovation.

‍

Metrics and KPIs to Track AI Security

‍

Measuring AI security is essential to validate control effectiveness and identify areas for continuous improvement. The right metrics help teams quantify exposure, prove compliance, and track progress as models and SaaS environments evolve.

‍

‍

Approaches and Techniques for AI Security

‍

Protecting AI systems requires specialized approaches that extend traditional cybersecurity methods into the model lifecycle. The techniques below form the foundation for securing data, code, and behavior across enterprise AI deployments.

• Machine Learning Security Testing (SAST, DAST for AI): Static and dynamic testing frameworks are adapted to evaluate AI components. Static tests examine model code, configurations, and dependencies for exposure points before deployment, while dynamic testing simulates real attacks on live endpoints to measure response behavior and resilience.
  
• Adversarial Training and Robustness Testing: Exposure to controlled adversarial inputs during training helps models learn to resist manipulation. Continuous robustness testing under varied data conditions ensures that models maintain consistent outputs even when facing malicious or unexpected queries.
  
• Model Monitoring and Threat Detection: Runtime monitoring detects behavioral drift, anomalous queries, or policy violations in real time. Integrating these signals with enterprise monitoring systems enables unified visibility across AI and SaaS assets, reducing response time and enhancing situational awareness.
  
• Encryption and Secure Data Handling: End-to-end encryption for stored and transmitted data, coupled with tokenization and anonymization, ensures confidentiality throughout the AI workflow. Restricting access based on roles and maintaining tamper-proof audit trails preserves integrity across the entire pipeline.

‍

AI Security Use Cases

‍

AI adoption now spans copilots, retrieval systems, and autonomous agents. Each class of application introduces different security challenges that demand targeted controls. The following use cases show how AI security principles apply in real enterprise environments:

‍

Support Copilots With PII Controls

‍

AI copilots streamline workflows but often process messages, tickets, and documents containing personal data. Without proper inspection, sensitive details can enter prompts or appear in model outputs. Applying real-time PII detection, redaction, and access control ensures copilots operate safely within compliance boundaries.

‍

Harden RAG Knowledge Bots and Retrieval Access

‍

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems connect language models to enterprise data sources. If these sources are poorly permissioned or indexed, confidential data may surface in responses. Restricting retrieval scopes, validating query context, and monitoring data embeddings prevent unauthorized exposure during knowledge access.

‍

Govern Agentic Automation and Change Management

‍

Agentic AI systems can autonomously initiate actions or workflow changes across SaaS platforms when granted integration permissions. Unchecked automation creates risks of unapproved actions or privilege escalation. Implementing policy enforcement, approval gates, and action-level logging establishes accountability and keeps automation aligned with governance rules.

‍

Detect AI Usage Anomalies Across SaaS

‍

As employees experiment with generative tools, AI activity patterns change rapidly. Tracking API calls, prompt frequency, and data movement across connected applications helps reveal unapproved or risky behavior. Correlating these insights with identity and access data enables early intervention before incidents escalate.

‍

Insight by
Gal Nakash
Cofounder & CPO at Reco

Gal is the Cofounder & CPO of Reco. Gal is a former Lieutenant Colonel in the Israeli Prime Minister's Office. He is a tech enthusiast, with a background of Security Researcher and Hacker. Gal has led teams in multiple cybersecurity areas with an expertise in the human element.

Expert Tip: Strengthening AI Security From the Inside Out

AI security maturity rarely comes from new frameworks alone. It begins within the everyday workflows where users interact with models and data in real time. Recognizing and refining these interactions turns ordinary activity into the foundation of stronger governance. Here’s what I recommend:

• Embed Policy Feedback Within AI Tools: When an action is blocked, explain why in real time to turn each event into a learning moment.
• Run Quarterly Red Team Simulations: Controlled attack exercises reveal blind spots in prompt handling and response validation.
• Map Human and AI Interactions: Track who uses which copilots and for what purpose to strengthen accountability.

Takeaway: AI security improves most when teams treat every user action as an opportunity to learn, refine, and strengthen collective awareness.

‍

AI Security Best Practices

‍

Effective AI security depends on strong governance, operational readiness, and continuous refinement. These best practices help teams mature their defense posture while keeping innovation under control.

• Implement Robust Data Governance: Classify, label, and monitor all data entering or leaving AI systems. Define policies for retention, sharing, and deletion so that sensitive datasets remain isolated and traceable throughout the AI lifecycle.
  
• Establish Incident Response Playbooks: Treat AI security events as distinct from conventional SOC incidents. Build playbooks for prompt injection, model drift, or data poisoning, and rehearse response steps with security, data science, and operations teams.
  
• Conduct Regular Security Audits: Schedule recurring reviews of model configurations, access permissions, and third-party dependencies. Audits help confirm compliance with internal standards and evolving regulatory frameworks.
  
• Promote AI Security Awareness Across Teams: Extend security training to developers, analysts, and business units using AI tools. Practical sessions on secure prompting, data handling, and reporting channels reduce user-driven exposure.
  
• Policy Simulation and Dry-Run Mode: Before deploying new AI policies, test them in a controlled environment to evaluate enforcement accuracy and unintended side effects. Simulations help fine-tune detection thresholds and approval workflows.
  
• Fail-Closed Kill Switches and Safe Fallbacks: Build emergency stop mechanisms that immediately disable model outputs or integrations when abnormal behavior is detected. Safe fallback modes preserve functionality while isolating the affected component for analysis.

‍

How Reco Strengthens AI Security

‍

Reco brings visibility and control to how AI operates across SaaS environments. Linking activity data, identity context, and model interactions allows security teams to monitor, govern, and enforce responsible AI use at scale. Its capabilities include:

• Discovers Shadow AI and LLM Usage Across SaaS: Reco identifies unauthorized or unsanctioned AI tools operating within SaaS environments. This discovery allows teams to map who is using which models, what data they access, and where policy gaps exist.
  
• Classifies Sensitive Data in Prompts and Outputs: Built-in detection automatically scans AI prompts and generated content for personally identifiable, financial, or proprietary data. Classification ensures sensitive information remains contained and auditable.
  
• Enforces Policies, Block Risky AI Actions, Coach Users: Reco enforces AI usage policies in real time, preventing data exposure or unsafe automation. When users trigger blocked actions, contextual coaching messages explain the risk and guide compliant behavior.
  
• Maps SaaS-to-SaaS and Agentic Flows End-to-End: Reco visualizes how generative or agentic AI interacts with multiple SaaS systems. This mapping provides full traceability of data exchanges and workflow triggers across connected platforms.
  
• Maintains Audit-Ready Logs for Compliance: Every AI interaction, policy action, and exception is recorded in immutable logs. These records support audits for frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and the upcoming EU AI Act requirements.

‍

Conclusion

‍

AI now sits at the center of enterprise transformation, enabling static systems to become adaptive decision-makers. The same intelligence that accelerates growth also demands new discipline. Securing AI is not a one-time framework but an evolving mindset that unites engineering precision with human oversight. Organizations that approach AI security as a continuous practice rooted in transparency, accountability, and collaboration will stay ahead of both innovation and threat. Those who do not will find that what made them faster also made them easier to breach.